Fitch Downgrades Bangkok Bank to 'BBB' on Coronavirus Outbreak

ข่าวหุ้น-การเงิน Friday April 3, 2020 13:14 —PRESS RELEASE LOCAL

Bangkok--3 Apr--Fitch Ratings Fitch Ratings has downgraded Bangkok Bank Public Company Limited's (BBL) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'BBB' from 'BBB+', and affirmed the Short-Term IDR at 'F2' and the National Long-Term Rating at 'AA+(tha)'. The Outlooks are Stable. At the same time, Fitch downgraded BBL's senior unsecured debt rating to 'BBB' from 'BBB+', downgraded the subordinated notes to 'BB+' from 'BBB' and removed the ratings from Under Criteria Observation. The downgrade reflects BBL's challenging operating environment and large-scale economic disruptions from the coronavirus pandemic. These follow Thailand's weak operating environment in the past several years on slower domestic and global economic growth. The Bank of Thailand's relief measures to assist in debt restructuring cannot eliminate the risks for weaker and more vulnerable debtors. For details on Thailand's operating environment, please see "Coronavirus Increases Challenges for Thai Banks' Operating Environment", dated 2 April 2020 at https://www.fitchratings.com/research/banks/coronavirus-increases-challenges-for-thai-banks-operating-environment-02-04-2020. The duration and trajectory of the coronavirus outbreak remains uncertain. As such, Fitch expects BBL's asset quality and performance to be significantly affected over the next two years in a base-case scenario, with core ratios weakening significantly compared with 2019. BBL will be affected by rising credit costs and its top-line revenue will continue to soften because of the low interest-rate environment and a moderation in non-interest income, while its capital position will also weaken as a result of its pending acquisition of Indonesia-based PT Bank Permata Tbk (Permata; AAA(idn)/Rating Watch Negative). KEY RATING DRIVERS IDRS, NATIONAL RATINGS AND SENIOR DEBT The IDRs, National Ratings and ratings on the senior debt of BBL are driven by its standalone credit profile, which is denoted by its VR. The senior debt represents unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the bank and is equalised with the bank's Long-Term IDR. The Short-Term IDR corresponds to criteria and takes into consideration Fitch's assessment of the bank's funding and liquidity profile, which is assessed at 'bbb+'.The affirmation of the National Ratings reflects Fitch's view of BBL's credit profile relative to Thailand's national-rating universe, which remains little changed despite the bank's weakening trends, as indicated by the downgrade of the IDRs. VR The VR of BBL reflects the bank's leading domestic franchise with a particular strength in corporate and international banking. That said, the rating also reflects our assessment that the operating environment will weaken significantly with a sharp contraction in the Thai economy. The rating incorporates our belief that BBL's earnings will decline because of those operating and economic challenges, with deterioration in asset quality already contributing to persistently high provision costs. Furthermore, the pending acquisition of Permata may expose BBL to more earnings volatility in the medium-term through a greater exposure to a weaker operating environment. The Permata acquisition is scheduled for completion by year-end. BBL's common equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio is likely to decrease by up to 3%, after the transaction is finalised. BBL expects to increase core capital levels gradually through profit retention; however, the operating environment challenges will significantly hurt capital-generating capacity at least in the near-term. Fitch therefore sees greater potential for a delay in improving capitalisation. BBL's credit profile and loss-absorption buffers are superior relative to most other lower-rated banks operating in similar environments. This should limit downward pressure on the bank's ratings in the next 12-18 months. BBL's above-peer liquidity position and loan loss coverage ratio should support the bank's capability to withstand the increasingly challenging environment. SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR (SRF) The Support Rating and SRF of BBL are based on BBL's systemic importance to the Thai financial system, as reflected by its significant deposit market share of 17% as of end-2019. We believe that there is a high probability the government would provide extraordinary support to the bank, if needed, given its role as one of Thailand's domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs). SUBORDINATED DEBT The downgrade of BBL's subordinated notes (Basel III-compliant Tier 2 and non-Basel III-compliant Tier2) reflects the lower Long-Term IDR, which is an anchor rating of BBL's subordinated debt, and the changes in Fitch's updated criteria on the baseline notching for banks' subordinated (Tier 2) debt to two notches below the anchor rating, from the previous approach of one or two notches. This is because we believe there is a heightened risk of significant losses for this debt class, with the two notches reflecting our view of the notes' loss severity risk in comparison with senior debt. The notes have no going-concern loss-absorption feature, and hence there is no additional notching for non-performance risk. RATING SENSITIVITIES IDRS, NATIONAL RATINGS AND SENIOR DEBT Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade: The IDRs, National Ratings and ratings on the senior debt of BBL are sensitive to changes in its standalone profile as indicated by its VR. Positive action on BBL's Viability Rating could lead to similar action on the bank's Long-Term IDR and senior debt rating. Changes in Fitch's perception of BBL's credit profile relative to the national-rating universe in Thailand could affect BBL's National Ratings. However, an upgrade of the National Ratings is not probable in the near term, given BBL's credit profile and rating relative to local large-bank peers. Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action/Downgrade: Negative action on the Viability Rating would lead to similar action on the IDR and senior debt rating, although downside may be limited to Fitch's assessment of the Support Rating and Support Rating Floor, the latter of which is currently 'BBB-'. A downgrade of BBL's National Ratings would likely arise from a weakening in its overall credit profile on a relative basis to the national-rating universe of Thai financial institutions. VR Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade: The VR could be upgraded to 'bbb+' if the asset-quality trend is more consistent with higher-rated banks operating in a 'bbb' category environment (eg NPL ratio of below 3%), combined with maintenance of sound buffers in loan-loss reserves and core capital (eg CET1 ratio sustained above 16%). This would also depend on profitability being sustainably improved, without an increase in risk appetite, as this would aid internal capital generation or retention. Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action/Downgrade: The VR could be downgraded to 'bbb-' if BBL's capitalisation deteriorated further to be an insufficient buffer to poor asset quality; for example, the CET1 ratio weakens to lower than 13% over the next two years with its non-performing loan (NPL) ratio above 6% and loan-loss coverage ratio lower than 120%. In our view, this could arise if BBL's profitability were to be further compromised, with the potential for deterioration in its profitability and asset quality, reflecting both the challenging operating environment and the bank's perceived appetite for risk. SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR (SRF) Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade: The Support Rating Floor could be upgraded if Fitch assesses that there is a higher propensity for the state to provide support to D-SIBs, including BBL. However, Fitch does not expect such changes over the medium term. An upgrade of Thailand's Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR of 'BBB+'/Stable may also indicate the government's higher ability to support banks (including BBL), but any assessment on the Support Rating Floor would also need to consider there is no lower propensity to support the banks. Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action/Downgrade: Fitch may take negative action on BBL's Support Rating and Support Rating Floor if the government's ability to support the bank diminishes. This may happen if the agency downgrades Thailand's Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR. Furthermore, if Fitch believes there is a lower propensity for the state to provide support to D-SIBs, including BBL, the rating could be downgraded. However, Fitch does not expect such changes over the medium term. SUBORDINATED DEBT Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade: The subordinated debt instruments of BBL would be upgraded if its Long-Term IDR is upgraded. Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Downgrade: The subordinated debt instruments of BBL would be downgraded if its Long-Term IDR is downgraded. ESG CONSIDERATIONS The highest level of ESG credit relevance, if present, is a score of 3. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity(ies), either due to their nature or to the way in which they are being managed by the entity(ies). For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg. BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO Ratings of financial institutions issuer have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579. REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com

เว็บไซต์นี้มีการใช้งานคุกกี้ ศึกษารายละเอียดเพิ่มเติมได้ที่ นโยบายความเป็นส่วนตัว และ ข้อตกลงการใช้บริการ รับทราบ