Moody's downgrades the local currency deposit ratings of Krung Thai Bank; changes the financial strength rating outlook to positive

ข่าวเศรษฐกิจ Tuesday October 4, 2011 08:44 —PRESS RELEASE LOCAL

Bangkok--4 Oct--Moody's Moody's Investors Service has todaydowngraded the local currency deposit ratings of Krung Thai Bank PublicCompany Limited (KTB) to Baa1/Prime-2, negative outlook, from A3/Prime-1,stable outlook. In addition, Moody's has changed the outlook on the foreign currencydeposit ratings of Baa1/Prime-2 to negative from stable.Krung Thai Bank Public Co. Ltd., Singapore Branch foreign currency hybrid issue of B2 (hyb) has been affirmed with a stable outlook. Separately, Moody's has changed the outlook on the bank's standalone bankfinancial strength rating (BFSR) of D-, which maps to Ba3 on thelong-term scale, to positive from stable. RATINGS RATIONALEDOWNGRADE OF LOCAL CURRENCY DEPOSIT RATINGS The downgrade reflects a recalibration of the systemic support assumptions that underpin Moody's ratings of KTB. Even though KTB is still 55%-owned by the state (The Bank of Thailand'srescue arm, and the Financial Institution Development Fund), the bankincreasingly functions as a commercial bank, with no specific policymandates from the government, unlike other specialized financialinstitutions like the Government Housing Bank (Baa1, stable; E+/B1stable), Export-Import Bank of Thailand (Baa1 stable), Bank forAgriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (unrated), Small and MediumEnterprise Development Bank (unrated), and the Government Savings Bank(unrated). As a result, Moody's decided that the six notches of ratingsuplift from its stand-alone Ba3 rating previously incorporated into KTB'slocal currency deposit ratings was excessive. Nonetheless, KTB plays a key role in the country's payment system as itis the second-largest Thai bank with a nation-wide footprint, and had an18% share of assets, loans, and deposits at end-2010. As a result,Moody's believes that the Thai government will still have a strongincentive to assist KTB, if needed, given KTB's systemic importance. Itis therefore appropriate that the bank's ratings continue to benefit fromseveral notches of systemic uplift. POSITIVE OUTLOOK ON BFSR At the same time, Moody's notes that KTB's stand-alone financial profileis on an improving trend. As a result, the outlook on its stand-alonerating has been changed to positive. The main driver of an improvedfinancial profile is a strengthening of asset quality. Its non-performingloans (NPLs, defined as loans 90+ days overdue) declined to THB67.5billion (5.1% of gross loans) at end-June 2011 from THB85.9 billion(8.2%) at end-2008 due to active debt management and minimal formationof new NPLs. Other aspects of the bank's financial profile show fewer clear-cut signsof improvement and generally lag KTB's major peers such as Bangkok Bank(Baa1 stable, C-/Baa2 stable), Siam Commercial Bank (Baa1 stable, C-/Baa2stable) and Kasikornbank (Baa1 stable, D+/Baa3 stable). KTB's Tier 1ratio declined to 8.5% at the end of June 2011 from 9.9% at the end of2010. This was due in part to the booking of one-time expenses related toIAS19 (employee benefits). Although KTB's Tier 1 is still more thandouble the central bank's requirement of 4.25%, its ability to absorbexpected medium-term credit losses under Moody's stress-test scenarios isweaker than its rated peers. On a pre-provision basis, earnings generation compares unfavorably toother similar-sized Thai banks and its "D" rated peers. KTB'spre-provision profits were 2.3% of average risk weighted assets for 2010. As with most other Thai banks, KTB's liquidity position is tightening, asevidenced by a 101% loan-to-deposit ratio at the end of 1H2011 (89% atend-2009). However, its sizable and stable core deposit base accountedfor nearly 80% of its funding at end- 2010, with a profile mainly inlocal currency. Nonetheless, while such metrics justify a stand-alone rating below thatof its main peers, overall KTB's financial profile is comfortablerelative to its Ba3 unsupported rating, especially given the strength ofthe bank's franchise as the second largest bank in Thailand. An upgradecould be considered if KTB manages to further reduce its NPLs whilemaintaining its capital, earnings and liquidity profile at their currentlevel. Specifically, An upgrade of the BFSR could follow if KTB sustains itstrack record of (i) reducing its NPL levels whereby the NPL ratiodeclines below 4%, while at the same time increasing its loan loss reserves coverage to that comparable to its peers; (ii) increasing itscapital such that the Tier 1 ratio is above 9%; and (iii) furtherbroadening and diversifying both its funding base and revenue sources -- primarily its consumer and fee income. NEGATIVE OUTLOOK ON DEPOSIT RATINGS Even after the one-notch downgrade of the local currency deposit ratingto Baa1, KTB continues to benefit from 5-notches of ratings uplift onaccount of systemic support. Moody's will continue to review theappropriateness of such high ratings uplift in the context of the bank'srole as a commercial bank. However, given the positive outlook on thestand-alone rating, it is possible that improvements in the bank'sfinancial profile will help narrow the gap between the stand-alone andsupported rating. The extent to which these improvements willsufficiently offset further reduction in the support assumption will bethe main driver of the deposit rating. Within 12-18 months (the normaltime horizon for Moody's outlooks), Moody's anticipates that the depositratings will benefit from no more than 3-4 notches of uplift forsystemic support. PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGIES The methodologies used in this rating were Bank Financial Strength Ratings: Global Methodology published in February 2007, and Incorporation of Joint-Default Analysis into Moody's Bank Ratings: A RefinedMethodology published in March 2007. Please see the Credit Policy pageon www.moodys.com for a copy of these methodologies. Headquartered in Bangkok, Thailand, KTB reported total assets of THB1,849 billion (USD61 billion) as of end- June 2011. REGULATORY DISCLOSURES The Global Scale Credit Ratings on this press release that are issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU are considered EU Qualified by Extension and therefore available for regulatory use in the EU. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office thathas issued a particular Credit Rating is available on www.moodys.com. For ratings issued on a program, series or category/class of debt, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to eachrating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series orcategory/class of debt or pursuant to a program for which the ratings arederived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody'srating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to therating action on the support provider and in relation to each particularrating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from thesupport provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, thisannouncement provides relevant regulatory disclosures in relation to theprovisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating thatmay be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in eachcase where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior tothe assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would haveaffected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com. Information sources used to prepare the rating are the following :parties involved in the ratings, public information, and confidentialand proprietary Moody's Investors Service information.Moody's considers the quality of information available on the ratedentity, obligation or credit satisfactory for the purposes of issuing a rating. Moody's adopts all necessary measures so that the information it usesin assigning a rating is of sufficient quality and from sources Moody'sconsiders to be reliable including, when appropriate, independentthird-party sources. However, Moody's is not an auditorand cannot in every instance independently verify or validate informationreceived in the rating process. Please see Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions on the Rating Processpage on www.moodys.com for further information on the meaningof each rating category and the definition of default and recovery.Please see ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the last rating action and the rating history.The date on which some ratings were first released goes back to a timebefore Moody's ratings were fully digitized and accurate data may notbe available. Consequently, Moody's provides a date thatit believes is the most reliable and accurate based on the informationthat is available to it. Please see the ratings disclosure pageon our website www.moodys.com for further information. Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes tothe lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issuedthe rating. Karolyn C. Seet Asst Vice President - Analyst Financial Institutions Group 50 Raffles Place #23-06 Singapore Land Tower Singapore 48623 Singapore JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350 SUBSCRIBERS: (65) 6398-8308 Stephen Long MD - Financial Institutions Financial Institutions Group JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350 SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-3077 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service Singapore Pte. Ltd. 50 Raffles Place #23-06 Singapore Land Tower Singapore 48623 Singapore JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -1350 SUBSCRIBERS: (65) 6398-8308 2011 Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved.

เว็บไซต์นี้มีการใช้งานคุกกี้ ศึกษารายละเอียดเพิ่มเติมได้ที่ นโยบายความเป็นส่วนตัว และ ข้อตกลงการใช้บริการ รับทราบ